Oasis in a Food Desert

Troy Nash • March 18, 2026

Share this article

Press Coverage: Kansas City Star, 2013; additional press coverage from 2001-2004

Try this exercise. Drive east from downtown Kansas City, through the Third District neighborhoods I represented on the Council. Count the full service grocery stores. When I started this fight in the early 2000s, the answer in large stretches of the East Side was zero.

Residents in my district had to travel miles to buy fresh food. Not because they chose to live far from grocery stores. Because grocery chains had decided their neighborhoods were not worth investing in. The market had spoken, and it said these families did not deserve fresh vegetables within walking distance.

I rejected that verdict. And then I spent years fighting to reverse it.

The Problem

A food desert is not a natural phenomenon. It is a business decision compounded by decades of disinvestment. Grocery chains follow rooftops and income. When a neighborhood's population declines and incomes drop, the grocers leave. When the grocers leave, residents are left with convenience stores and fast food. When your primary food options are processed snacks and drive-through meals, the health consequences are predictable: diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and shortened lives.

This was the reality in multiple neighborhoods across Kansas City's East Side. Not a theoretical problem discussed at urban planning conferences. A daily reality for families trying to feed their children.

The economics of grocery retail work against low income communities in ways that most people do not understand. Grocery stores operate on razor thin margins, typically 1 to 3 percent net profit. That means a grocery operator needs high volume to survive, and high volume requires a customer base with sufficient purchasing power. When household incomes are low, the per-transaction revenue is lower, and the store needs even more volume to make the numbers work. Add higher insurance costs, higher shrinkage rates, and the increased security expenses that come with operating in high-crime areas, and the financial model becomes challenging.

None of that excuses the outcome. The fact that the economics are difficult does not make it acceptable for entire neighborhoods to go without fresh food. It means that the market alone cannot solve this problem. Public intervention is required.

What We Did

As a city councilman representing the Third District, I made grocery access a priority. This was not a popular cause with other council members. Grocery stores are not glamorous. They do not generate the kind of headlines that downtown sports arenas produce. But they are the most basic infrastructure a neighborhood needs, and my constituents were living without them.

The work started with the campaign to save Leon's Thriftway at Seven Oaks Shopping Center. Leon's was the grocery store that served one of the most underserved areas of the East Side. When the store faced closure, it was not just a business failing. It was a community lifeline being cut. I introduced an ordinance to preserve the grocery and the shopping center, using every legislative tool available to create the conditions for the store to remain viable.

The Kansas City Star and other outlets covered the fight extensively. This was not abstract policy. This was a community fighting to keep its only source of fresh food. The headlines documented each phase: "Ordinance Introduced to Save Seven Oaks Shopping Center and Leon's Thriftway." "Ordinance Introduced to Save Local Grocery Store." The coverage put public pressure on the city to act, and it worked.

We also worked to bring an ALDI grocery store to the East Side. ALDI's expansion into urban core neighborhoods was a strategic opportunity that we pursued aggressively. ALDI's business model, with its lower operating costs and discount pricing structure, was better suited to low income markets than traditional full-service grocers. But getting a national grocery chain to commit to a location that other retailers had written off still required persistent advocacy, public incentive packages, and proof that the market demand existed.

The Kansas City Star covered the community celebration when the ALDI location was confirmed. "Supporters work to bag Aldi grocery for East Side." "ALDI Continues Expansion." "Celebrating New Grocery Store." These were not just headlines. They were documentation of what happens when a community and its elected representative refuse to accept that they do not deserve fresh food.

I first approached ALDI about building in the neighborhood in 2004. The tax incentive plan was approved in 2006. Then came years of delays: land acquisition that required condemnation of two parcels, the recession, environmental remediation of underground petroleum storage tanks, and amendments to the TIF plan when officials realized many customers would use food stamps exempt from sales taxes. The broader effort culminated in a groundbreaking for the 16,850 square foot ALDI grocery store at 39th and Prospect on July 30, 2013 — nine years after I first proposed it. By then I had left the Council, and my successor in the Third District, Councilman Jermaine Reed, carried the project across the finish line. The Kansas City Star covered that groundbreaking with the headline "Oasis in a food desert finally has groundbreaking." ALDI invested $3.5 million, with tax incentives bringing the total project to about $5 million. That headline says everything about how long this fight took and how important the outcome was.

Why It Took So Long

Bringing grocery access to underserved neighborhoods is harder than it should be. National chains use site selection criteria that systematically screen out low income neighborhoods: household income thresholds, population density requirements, traffic counts. These criteria are race neutral on paper but discriminatory in practice, because they filter out exactly the neighborhoods that need grocery access most.

Breaking through those criteria requires a combination of public subsidy, community advocacy, and a developer willing to take on the risk. You have to prove to a grocery operator that the demand is real, that the public support is in place, and that the neighborhood will support the store once it opens.

That takes years. It requires patience that most elected officials and most developers do not have. I had it because I was not doing this for a press conference. I was doing it because families in my district were going hungry.

The Lesson

Affordable housing without food access is incomplete. You can build the most beautiful affordable housing development in the city, but if the nearest grocery store is four miles away, you have not solved the problem. You have just relocated it.

The Nash Group thinks about development holistically. Housing, transit, food access, healthcare, education — these are not separate policy silos. They are interconnected systems that determine whether a neighborhood works. The grocery access fight taught me that lesson early, and it has informed every project we have done since.

When we evaluate a development site today, one of the first things we assess is the food environment. What is available within walking distance? What retail anchors already exist? What gaps need to be filled? Because a home is not just four walls and a roof. A home is a place where a family can live a full life. And a full life requires fresh food on the table.

The oasis we fought for in Kansas City's East Side was not a luxury. It was a correction of a decades long injustice. And it took a city councilman, a community, and years of persistent effort to make it happen.

Recent Posts

By Troy Nash March 19, 2026
I grew up in public housing. Section 8. Kansas City, Missouri. That is not a metaphor or a brand story. That is where I slept at night. My mother raised us without much, but she raised us with an understanding that where you start does not determine where you finish. I took that seriously. Maybe more seriously than she intended, because by the time I was done, I had collected nine academic degrees, traveled to more than 50 countries, served on the Kansas City Council, been appointed to the Missouri Housing Development Commission by the governor, joined the boards of a bank, a university, and a national development company, and built a real estate advisory firm that operates across multiple states. Savoy Magazine named me among the Most Influential Black Executives in Corporate America in 2020 and again in 2022. Ingram's Magazine put me on their list of 50 Missourians You Should Know in 2015. I am telling you this not to impress you but to establish a fact: the trajectory from public housing to national recognition is documented. It is not a claim. It is a record. The Arc Nine degrees sounds excessive until you understand the logic. Each degree opened a door that the previous one could not. A bachelor's degree got me into law school. Law school gave me the tools to understand policy. A master's in public administration taught me how government actually works from the inside. An MBA taught me how capital flows. A doctorate gave me the credibility to teach at a university. Every credential was a strategic investment in the next phase of the work. People ask me why I kept going back to school. The answer is simple: every time I reached the next level of my career, I discovered that I needed knowledge I did not yet have. When I entered government, I needed to understand public administration. When I started doing development deals, I needed to understand finance. When I wanted to teach at a university, I needed the terminal degree. Education was never the goal. It was always the tool. The Kansas City Council taught me how cities make decisions. Chairing the Planning, Zoning, and Economic Development Committee showed me the full machinery of urban development: the politics, the financing, the community dynamics, and the trade-offs that nobody talks about publicly. Every major development project in Kansas City crossed my desk. Every zoning change. Every tax abatement. Every TIF district. I saw how the system worked from the inside, and that education was more valuable than any degree. The Missouri Housing Commission taught me how states allocate Low Income Housing Tax Credits. As a commissioner appointed by Governor Jay Nixon, I sat on the other side of the table from the developers who submitted applications. I evaluated their proposals. I participated in discussions about which projects deserved limited state resources. That experience is available from almost nobody in the private sector, because almost nobody in the private sector has served as a housing commissioner. Traveling to 50 countries was not tourism. It was education. I studied housing systems in Europe, urban planning models in Asia, community development approaches in Africa and Latin America. In Cuba, I studied a healthcare delivery model that puts a doctor in every neighborhood, and I brought that concept back to Kansas City, where it eventually influenced our approach to co-locating healthcare with affordable housing. Every country taught me something. Every lesson informed the work. Why I Built The Nash Group After years in government and education, I understood something that most people in this field do not: the gap between policy and execution is where communities get hurt. Policies exist. Funding exists. Tax credits exist. But the people who can actually structure a deal, navigate the politics, manage the construction, and deliver housing that serves the community are rare. There are plenty of policy experts who cannot execute. There are plenty of builders who do not understand policy. There are plenty of consultants who have never served in government. The Nash Group exists because I have done all three, and I built a firm that brings all three capabilities to every project. We do not just advise. We develop. We do not just develop. We teach. The Lewis White Real Estate Center at UMKC, where I serve as director, trains the next generation of real estate professionals using the same principles that built the firm. That is not a side project. It is core to the mission, because the problems we work on will outlast any individual career. What This Story Means For You If you are a prospective client evaluating whether to work with us, here is what my story tells you: I have been on every side of this table. I have been the resident who needed housing. I have been the elected official who voted on housing policy. I have been the commissioner who allocated tax credits. I have been the developer who built the housing. And I have been the professor who teaches others how to do it. That is not a typical resume in this industry. Most people know one side. I know all of them. And that knowledge shows up in every project we touch, because we understand not just what needs to be built but why it matters and who it serves. When we sit across the table from a housing finance agency, we understand their perspective because I have been a commissioner. When we engage with a city council on an entitlement approval, we understand the political dynamics because I chaired the committee that made those decisions. When we structure a capital stack, we understand the investor's requirements because I have an MBA and have closed these deals myself. When we engage with community residents, we understand their concerns because I grew up in public housing and I have lived in the conditions that bad housing creates. The kid from Section 8 did not forget where he came from. He turned it into a career that has generated hundreds of millions of dollars in community investment across multiple cities. That is the power of refusing to accept your starting point as your endpoint. Thirty years. Nine degrees. Fifty countries. And it all started in public housing in Kansas City. ================================================================= THEME 2: AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT =================================================================
By Troy Nash March 19, 2026
People always want to know how I got here. They see the degrees, the developments, the board seats, and they assume there was some master plan. There was not. What there was, at the very beginning, was a kitchen table and a set of circumstances that demanded I do something about them. In 1995, I was 25 years old, a law student at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, living with my wife Sherrie in a house on Charlotte Street near Brookside. My three older brothers — Harvey, Daryl, and Todd — were smart men with no credentials and no clear path forward. They had the ability but not the access. Nobody had shown them how to navigate the system that separates people who can from people who do. I decided that if nobody else was going to do it, I would. Every Saturday at 10 a.m., we held a formal meeting at my house. I sat at that kitchen table and worked with all three of my brothers. We went through the material together. We talked about what college actually was, what it required, and what it could open up. The brothers all wore ties. They rose when they spoke, observed parliamentary procedure, and referred to one another by formal titles. It was not some grand philanthropic project. This was family. These were my brothers, and they were too talented to stay where they were. There is a particular kind of frustration that comes from watching people you love operate below their potential. Not because they are lazy or incapable, but because nobody ever sat them down and said: here is how this works. Here is what you need to do. Here is the path. My brothers had spent their entire lives in a system that was not designed to show them that path. The schools they attended were underfunded. The neighborhoods they grew up in were disinvested. The message they received from every institutional interaction was that people like them did not go to college. I rejected that message. And then I spent months proving it wrong, one brother at a time. One by one, each of them enrolled in college. The conversations were not always easy. When you are an adult who has been out of school for years, the idea of going back feels impossible. You feel too old. You feel too far behind. You feel like the opportunity has passed. My job was to break through that feeling and replace it with evidence: here is the application. Here is the financial aid form. Here is the course catalog. You can do this. I will help you. My mother watched her sons transform their lives, and then she did the same thing. At 55 years old, my mother earned her GED. She looked at what her boys were doing and decided she was not going to be left behind. That is the most powerful thing I have ever witnessed in my life. A woman who had spent decades raising children in public housing, who had every reason to believe that her own educational moment had passed, looked at her sons and said: if they can do it, so can I. She was right. Why This Matters I tell this story not because it makes for a good profile piece, although it does. I tell it because it explains everything that came after. Every development I have built, every policy I have fought for, every classroom I have taught in comes from the same impulse that put me at that kitchen table: if the people around you have the ability but not the access, you create the access. This was not about charity. It was about refusing to accept that my family's circumstances were permanent. The housing projects where I grew up taught me that systems create conditions, and conditions shape lives. But they also taught me that individuals can break those conditions if somebody shows up with a plan and the willingness to execute it. My brothers did not need saving. They needed a bridge. That is the same thing I have spent the last 30 years building for communities across this country. Different scale, same principle. The parallel to affordable housing development is direct. When we build housing in an underserved neighborhood, we are not rescuing the community. We are providing infrastructure that allows the talent and determination that already exists in that community to flourish. The families who move into our developments are not charity cases. They are people who need a bridge between where they are and where they want to be. Quality, affordable housing is that bridge. The same is true of the policy work. When I sat on the Kansas City Council and fought for investment in East Side neighborhoods, I was not arguing that those neighborhoods were helpless. I was arguing that they deserved the same public infrastructure that the rest of the city took for granted. The people were capable. The systems had failed them. The Lesson When people evaluate The Nash Group, they are evaluating whether we actually care about the communities we serve. I understand that skepticism because I have seen plenty of developers who treat affordable housing as a transaction. Build the units, collect the credits, move on. That is not us. Our commitment to community transformation predates the company. It predates my career. It started at a kitchen table in Kansas City with a 25 year old kid who refused to watch his brothers get left behind. My mother earning her GED at 55 proved something I have believed ever since: it is never too late, and nobody is beyond reach. That conviction shows up in every project we take on. When we build housing in a neighborhood that has been disinvested for decades, we do not just build units. We build the infrastructure that lets people reach for something better. The Kansas City Star covered this story in 1995, back when I was just getting started. They saw a young man helping his family. What I see, looking back, is the foundational act that defined everything. If you can change your family, you can change a block. If you can change a block, you can change a neighborhood. If you can change a neighborhood, you can change a city. That is not a slogan. That is a 30 year track record. And it started with three brothers, a kitchen table, and a refusal to accept that where you start is where you finish.
By Troy Nash March 18, 2026
Press Coverage: Kansas City Star; Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Visits Kansas City
By Troy Nash March 18, 2026
Press Coverage: Kansas City Star; Nash, Weaver Secure Funding for Police Trailer and ATVs to Help Fight Crime; City Councilman Unveils Plan to Combat Crime in the Third District
By Troy Nash March 18, 2026
Press Coverage: Kansas City Star; City Councilmen Sponsor Forum to Bridge the Racial Divide; KC Councilmen Share Lessons of Diversity; Students Say Racism Exists in KC
By Troy Nash March 18, 2026
Press Coverage: Kansas City Star; Ordinance by Nash, Williams-Neal Targets Troost Revitalization
By Troy Nash March 18, 2026
Press Coverage: Kansas City Star; Labor Unions Partner with City to Renovate Community Centers; Councilman Nash Continues Partnership with Labor Unions; Labor Groups Endorse Troy Nash
By Troy Nash March 18, 2026
Press Coverage: Kansas City Star; KC Seeks New Jobs, Business with Mexico; KC Group Will Prospect in Costa Rica; New Council Panel Aims to Steer KC's Role in Global Trade; Council Nash Discusses Business Linkages with Mayors
By Troy Nash March 18, 2026
Press Coverage: Troy Nash Named to White House Board; PTPI Board of Trustees Meeting
By Troy Nash March 18, 2026
Press Coverage: Savoy Magazine, 2020 and 2022
Show More